Friday, February 25, 2005

Which is it? Subpoena Or No Subpoena?

Yet another "inconsistency."

"I wasn't subpoenaed."
Guckert said that contrary to many press reports, he was never subpoenaed by the special prosecutor and has never testified before a grand jury in the case. But he said he was interviewed by two FBI agents in his home for about 90 minutes last year.

"I answered their questions truthfully and honestly, but I would prefer not to say more," he said. "I assume the information was routed back and that is why I was not called to testify."
"I was subpoenaed."
Well, as many of you now know, I have been subpeonaed [sic] by the Federal grand jury for testimony in the CIA leak probe.
Tough to keep the story straight, one would assume.

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

You go, girl. Good blog. I have Georgia on my mind and a link to your blog in my favorites. Remember though, Propagannon is just a small part of the much larger problem:

McMediagate

8:36 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lets put this on the Republikken party. If they keep ignoring this , they will eventually be forced to answer this come 2008. How could they as a party allow a Gay Hooker into their White House? How can a party who uses"values" allow PROSTITUTION and PORNOGRAPHY to be so intertwined into their leadership while they were in complete control of the Government?
Its in their court, answer me now or answer me later. All Republikkkens are embracing this behavior by allowing it to go on without answering the charges and doing something about them.
ksecus

8:59 PM  
Blogger chriscol said...

I'm thinking you could possibly use a proofreader?

chriscol at charter dot net

9:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

EXCELLENT, Let's keep this story on the front burner and in the news!!!

2:01 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Liars must have perfect memories. Obviously Gannon does not such a memory, thus is a bad liar.

11:48 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home